Why is Food Preservative BHT Banned in Japan but Not the U.S.?

Why is Food Preservative BHT Banned in Japan but Not the U.S.?
Table Of Content
Close

Examining the Ban of BHT in Japan

BHT, or butylated hydroxytoluene, is a common food additive used to help preserve and maintain freshness. However, it has been banned for use in Japan over health concerns, while still being widely utilized in places like the United States.

This has raised many questions around the safety of BHT and whether or not regulators in other countries should consider similar restrictions. Looking at the reasons behind banning BHT in Japan can help shed light on the debate around this controversial preservative.

What is BHT?

BHT stands for butylated hydroxytoluene. It is an additive commonly used in the food industry to help maintain freshness and extend shelf life.

As an antioxidant, BHT helps prevent oxidation that can cause foods to spoil or go rancid. It works by protecting the fragile unsaturated fats in food from reacting with oxygen.

BHT is frequently added to products like cereal, gum, vegetable oils, and cosmetics. It helps provide stability to these products during storage and gives them a longer shelf life.

Why is BHT Banned in Japan?

In 1959, Japan made the decision to ban the use of BHT as a food additive over concerns regarding its safety.

There were two main health-related reasons behind this landmark ban:

  • Carcinogenic risks - Some early studies in rats indicated that high doses of BHT may be linked to tumor growth. There were worries that BHT could potentially be carcinogenic to humans as well.
  • Liver toxicity - Again in rat studies, there were signs that BHT may negatively impact liver health and cause damage at high enough doses.

While many of these rat studies utilized BHT amounts well above typical human exposure levels, regulators in Japan decided to take a precautionary approach regarding this additive.

The ban was enacted amidst growing concern about synthetic chemicals like BHT entering the food supply and theoretical links to conditions like cancer.

BHT Regulations in the United States

While banned outright as a food additive in Japan, BHT is still widely authorized for use in foods in the United States and Europe.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved BHT for various uses, considering it “generally recognized as safe” when added to foods in prescribed amounts.

Under FDA rules, BHT cannot exceed concentrations of 0.02% by weight in foods. These low-level uses are not expected to pose any health risks to consumers.

Manufacturers must also label BHT as an ingredient on food packaging so people are informed if a product contains this additive.

The EPA has set much more stringent restrictions on BHT levels in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals compared to food uses.

Ongoing Debate Over BHT Safety

Ever since the Japanese ban, there has been debate and discussion around whether regulators in other countries should also prohibit BHT as a food additive.

Some organizations, like the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), have called for a complete ban on BHT in food. They point to lingering uncertainty over BHT’s long-term safety.

However, major regulatory bodies like the FDA maintain that permitted uses of BHT are safe. They cite a lack of definitive evidence showing harm to human health from such low-level exposures.

A closer look at some of the key areas of concern around BHT sheds light on the debate:

Carcinogenic Risks

One of the original reasons BHT was banned in Japan was fear over potential cancer-causing effects.

While early rat studies hinted at increased cancer rates from high BHT doses, more recent research has not confirmed any substantial carcinogenic risk for humans.

The EPA has deemed current uses of BHT in foods to be non-carcinogenic when exposure levels are kept low.

Effects on Liver

Along with cancer concerns, Japan’s ban cited possible liver toxicity from BHT.

Again, later research has found that the small amounts of BHT allowed in foods are very unlikely to cause any observable liver damage in humans.

One study gave subjects up to 16 times the recommended daily BHT intake with no adverse impacts on liver function tests.

Hormone Disruption

Another concern has been whether BHT may have hormone-disrupting effects, interfering with the endocrine system.

While some limited studies suggest BHT may be able to bind to hormone receptors, there is little evidence that typical dietary exposures would significantly disrupt hormone function or human health.

More research is still needed to better understand any potential hormone-related effects from BHT and at what dosage levels they may occur.

Allergies

A small subset of people may have allergic sensitivities or reactions to BHT.

However, allergic symptoms like skin rashes appear very uncommon. BHT allergies do not seem to be a widespread issue or reason for general avoidance.

Those who suspect a personal allergy can try avoiding products listing BHT as an ingredient to see if symptoms improve.

Alternatives to BHT

For consumers hoping to avoid BHT, there are some alternative preservatives used in food products:

Ascorbic Acid

Also known as vitamin C, ascorbic acid is a natural antioxidant that can help prevent spoilage.

It occurs naturally in many fruits and vegetables. Added as a food additive, it can help replace synthetic preservatives like BHT.

Vitamin E

Vitamin E is another antioxidant that can provide stability to foods. Like BHT, it helps prevent oxidation that leads to rancidity.

Natural vitamin E extracted from vegetable oils can serve as a safe, plant-based alternative to BHT in many products.

Rosemary Extract

Extracts from the rosemary herb contain antioxidant compounds like carnosic acid and rosmarinic acid.

These natural chemicals can effectively prevent oxidation while providing an appealing natural flavor.

Sodium Ascorbate

A more stable sodium salt version of vitamin C, sodium ascorbate is used to control food spoilage while avoiding undesirable flavor changes.

It serves as a popular alternative to synthetic preservatives in products like cured meats and frozen fish.

Risk Assessment of BHT

Evaluating the potential health risks around any chemical additive involves assessing two key factors:

  1. The level of exposure - How much of the substance are people actually consuming?
  2. The dose-response - What is the relationship between exposure dose and adverse effects?

With BHT, permitted food uses involve very low concentrations, far below amounts linked to health problems in animal studies.

Additionally, no clear dose-dependent relationship has been demonstrated between typical BHT intakes and negative effects in humans.

These factors provide reasonable assurance that low-level BHT exposure from foods is not a significant health hazard. Strict regulations help restrict the amounts present in consumer products.

However, some argue that a precautionary approach to restricting synthetic additives like BHT may still be warranted from a public health perspective.

The BHT Ban in Japan - Takeaways

  • BHT is an antioxidant preservative used in foods to help maintain freshness and prevent spoilage.
  • Japan banned BHT as a food additive in 1959 over concerns about potential cancer and liver toxicity risks.
  • The FDA still permits low-level uses of BHT, deeming it safe for human consumption at prescribed levels.
  • While some organizations have called for wider BHT bans, major regulators believe permitted uses are non-toxic for humans.
  • Natural preservatives like vitamin C, vitamin E, and plant extracts can serve as alternatives for consumers looking to avoid BHT.
  • Any health risks likely depend on BHT exposure dose, with low dietary amounts unlikely to pose problems.

The decades-old ban on BHT in Japan was an early case study in restricting synthetic food additives over health concerns. While banned in Japan, permitted uses of BHT in countries like the U.S. appear to carry minimal human health risks.

FAQs

Why did Japan ban the use of BHT in foods?

Japan banned BHT as a food additive in 1959 due to concerns about potential cancer-causing and liver toxicity effects based on animal studies, even though human exposure levels are much lower.

Is BHT banned in the United States?

No, the FDA still allows the use of BHT in foods at low concentrations. Manufacturers must list BHT as an ingredient and cannot exceed certain dosage limits set by regulators.

What are some alternatives to BHT in foods?

Natural antioxidant preservatives like vitamin C, vitamin E, rosemary extract, and sodium ascorbate can help replace synthetic BHT in some products.

Is BHT safe to consume at allowed levels?

Major regulatory agencies consider current permitted uses of BHT safe for human consumption. But some advocacy groups still argue for more caution with this controversial additive.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare professional before starting any new treatment regimen.

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Related Coverage

Latest news